A lot of times we create our stories and our characters based on ourselves, and things we feel the need to say. A lot of times our characters are ways for us to portray and defend out particular point of view. That's as it should be, I think. One of the greatest things about stories is that they provide a chance for our voices to be heard, via our characters. Being open in this way allows the story to connect with its readers who feel the same way. Like our good pal C. S. Lewis said, "We read to know we're not alone."
But.
What about characters you disagree with?
And I'm not talking about straw men characters--dumb, useless characters that "represent" the opposing point of view just so you can knock it down. I'm talking about really intelligent, engaging characters who fundamentally see the world differently than you do.
(Speaking of gorgeous, brilliant, fantastically written characters who see the world much more pessimistically than I wish to...)
I think there are lots of different ways to do this. Your opposing viewpoint character could eventually come around to your perspective, or not. Or maybe, and this is perhaps my preferred method, your two characters eventually talk things through and realize that many of the areas they thought they disagreed on, they actually have a lot in common. Maybe your opposing viewpoint character isn't even looking for your main character to change their mind necessarily, they're just looking for some sympathy and validation. Maybe that's the journey your main character needs to go on--finding the right way to give the other characters the sympathy and validation they need. Maybe both characters have a lot of growing and changing to do.
So give this a try. Maybe something surprising will come out of it.
Have you ever written a character you disagree with? What characters from books or movies do you disagree with but also love?
Sarah Allen
I wrote a horror flash fic recently titled "The Day She Came to Hate the NRA," despite the fact that I tilt slightly in favor of the NRA's existence. I can do this because it's more of a display of how someone can become anti-gun through witnessing gun violence than an outright anti-gun story.
ReplyDeleteOoh, that sounds interesting! I think it could be a valuable exercise to take something like that and write about it from the opposite perspective, like you did.
DeleteDid your character come to think the NRA was okay after all? :-)
DeleteWriting 'evil' characters is probably the ultimate example of this. The antagonist in my psychological thriller novel has always intrigued me. It has been a labour of love to weave a character from parts we understand and empathise with, and parts thrown in there, hopefully not too obviously at first, that are potentially frightening ... a lack of empathy with people's suffering, for instance, combined with self-pity and self-justification. Charming but deadly.
ReplyDeleteAh, yes. Charming but deadly, love it :)
DeleteI got a suggestion from a fellow critique group member that one of my main characters was TOO nice and I should find a way to create some tension with his character. I didn't much like him anyway, so I ran with it. I must say I enjoyed making him nasty. I still have no idea where the nasty came from, but it felt good.
ReplyDeleteOooh, nice! Making characters nasty can be super fun :)
DeleteYes saylingaway, I always think of Jane Austen's favourites among her characters - she loved Emma who was full of flaws - thinking about it she named some of her books after characters' flaws!
DeleteYes. I have written two very despicable and thoroughly debased characters for a slush novella that someday may see the light of day. I've also written a victim within the same story that I've come to detest as well.
ReplyDeleteFather Nature's Corner
Interesting. Lots of different types of characters can work with this idea.
DeleteI've never written one that ran polar opposite, but there are always attributes that I disagree with.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely, this can be a good way to add nuance and complexity to all your characters.
DeleteHistorical fiction is especially interesting in this regard. You can't create a character who thinks twenty- first century style in the Middle Ages, for example. At the same time, you have to be able to create a character you and your readers can care about.
ReplyDeletePS Is that Hugh Laurie in your photo? I'm used to him as a comedian, I'm afraid, especially in Blackadder, so have never got around to seeing him in that role.
ReplyDeleteIndeed it is :) I know, he is brilliant in Blackadder, which only makes me admire his versatility even more. I love his comedy, but his work as House is heartwrenching.
DeleteWhen I first read this I thought of Hermoine and Ron in the Harry Potter series. They portray pollar opposites of Harry. Or so I've heard and believe. :-)
ReplyDeleteAnna from Shout with Emaginette
Oooh, interesting! I hadn't thought if that way before, but yeah...they all balance each other out well.
Delete